WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8653
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Article Citation - WoS: 1Citation - Scopus: 1The Crime of Genocide in International Law and Underlying Social Structures of the Crime: Rwanda Case(Uluslararasi Iliskiler Konseyi dernegi, 2008) Coban, EbruGenocide is a crime which is defined under international law in the twentieth century and could not come about without the ideological, bureaucratic power of a modern state with its sanctions and modern discourses on identities and modern classifications. With a non-modern picture but with modem techniques of governing Rwanda was a place that genocidal killings occurred and is a place of a breaking case for modem theories. Rwanda has modern state characteristics in terms of monopoly of use of violence, giving orders and providing obedience of its people, surveillance, classification and registration of its people, and keeping discourses. Moreover, Rwandan culture that gives great importance to obedience and Rwandan geography that is so suitable to surveillance become additional factors. In that sense, Rwandan governments could influence to daily life of the people even to the smallest details of anyone. All factors provided a suitable base for the crime of genocide.Article An Assessment of Reconciliation Processes and Completion of the International Tribunal(International Relations Council of Turkey, 2016) Çoban Öztürk, E.; Ozturk, Ebru CobanAfter the 1994 Rwandan genocide, solution and social reconciliation processes has started in this country. These processes are being conducted in terms of politics, economics, social psychology and law both in international and national levels. The most important and substantial contribution to the reconciliation process has taken place mainly from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. The Tribunal was established as an ad hoc Tribunal but its contributions to the social reconciliation and international law is permanent. The Tribunal has completed its twenty first year for now and as an ad hoc tribunal, its mission is going to be terminated at the end of 2015 after completing its proceedings. The Tribunal’s mission was completed at December 31, 2015. The jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the ongoing cases will be assigned to national courts and to the newly established International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. This study presents the structure and completion strategy of the Tribunal and the contribution of it to the reconciliation processes of Rwanda. Then criticisms about the legal systems and social reconciliation are going to be discussed. © 2016, International Relations Council of Turkey. All rights reserved.Article Citation - WoS: 2Citation - Scopus: 6Barış Eğitimi: Evrimleşmiş bir Şiddetsizlik Bilinci için Eğitim(Center Foreign Policy & Peace Research, 2016) Yemenici, AlevBu makale beyin temelli ön bir barış eğitimi modeli sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Günümüzdeki barış eğitimi modellerinin vurguladığı insan hakları eğitimi, çevre eğitimi ve çatışma çözümü eğitimi konularının yanısıra, bu model şiddetin nörobiyolojik nedenleri ve erken önlenmesi meselelerinin ele alınabileceği yeni bir seviye -hücresel seviye- öne sürmektedir. Özellikle, bu model, şiddetin nörobiyolojik sebepleri ve önlenmesi ile erken travmanın doğum öncesi, doğum sırasında ve sonrasında gelişmekte olan beyin üzerindeki etkisi hakkındaki bilgileri yayılmasını savunmaktadır. Sevgi ve şiddete ilişkin kimyasallara dair temel ve beynin esas yapısı bu erken dönemlerde oluşmaktadır. Diğer bir deyişle bu model, çocuklar, ergenler ve yetişkinlerin eğitimi yoluyla şiddetin önlenebileceği hücresel bir boyut olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.Article Constructivism, Identity, 'manufactured Citizens: Russia's Citizenship Policies in Abkhazia and South Ossetia(Uluslararasi Iliskiler Konseyi dernegi, 2019) Ekinci, F. DidemThis paper discusses through a Constructivist perspective that the aim of maintaining influence via great power identity in the Near Abroad which preserved its significance in the post-1991 Russian foreign policy under the statist/pragmatist and civilizationist schools' influence, is reinforced through citizenship policies due to established collective identities with certain actors. The fact that Russia's conferral of citizenship to certain peoples through old collective identities via long-time great power identity is not a newly invented and ephemeral policy but that its roots reflect influence-driven subjecthood/citizenship policies since the Tsarist times, strengthens the assumption that the Near Abroad is an irreplaceable region for Russia which may practice similar policies towards other actors in the Near Abroad in the future.