Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Bayraktaroğlu, Deniz

Profile Picture
Profile URL
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/8716
Name Variants
Bayraktaroglu, Deniz
Job Title
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi
Email Address
denizbayraktaroglu@cankaya.edu.tr
Main Affiliation
Halkla İlişkiler ve Reklamcılık
Status
Current Staff
Website
ORCID ID
Scopus Author ID
Turkish CoHE Profile ID
Google Scholar ID
WoS Researcher ID
Files
02086.jpg (90.26 KB)

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG data is not available
This researcher does not have a Scopus ID.
This researcher does not have a WoS ID.
Scholarly Output

3

Articles

3

Views / Downloads

3/0

Supervised MSc Theses

0

Supervised PhD Theses

0

WoS Citation Count

16

Scopus Citation Count

18

WoS h-index

2

Scopus h-index

2

Patents

0

Projects

0

WoS Citations per Publication

5.33

Scopus Citations per Publication

6.00

Open Access Source

0

Supervised Theses

0

Google Analytics Visitor Traffic

JournalCount
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology3
Current Page: 1 / 1

Scopus Quartile Distribution

Competency Cloud

GCRIS Competency Cloud

Filters

2022 - 20243
Reset filters

Settings

Scholarly Output Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 14
    The Role of Positive Relationship Events in Romantic Attachment Avoidance
    (Amer Psychological Assoc, 2023) Bayraktaroglu, Deniz; Gunaydin, Gul; Selcuk, Emre; Besken, Miri; Karakitapoglu-Aygun, Zahide
    Motivated by the Attachment Security Enhancement Model (Arriaga et al., 2018), the present research investigated the associations between positive relationship experiences and romantic attachment avoidance in three dyadic studies that combined multiple methods, including daily diaries, laboratory observations, and longitudinal follow-ups. Frequency of daily positive relationship events (but not external positive events) during a 21-day diary period predicted declines in romantic attachment avoidance (but not anxiety) from pre- to post-diary in fledgling couples (Study 1) and newlyweds (Study 2). Video-recorded discussions of fledgling couples' shared positive experiences revealed that behaviors validating the relationship (but not simply showing conversational interest) predicted lagged declines in romantic attachment avoidance (but not anxiety) over 1 month (Study 3). The associations were mediated by positive affect during the diary period in Studies 1 and 2, and by changes in positive affect from pre- to post-discussion in Study 3. Positive relationship experiences did not significantly interact with time in predicting romantic avoidance over a 1-year follow-up with quarterly assessments of attachment orientations in Study 1, over an 8-month follow-up with monthly assessments in Study 2, or over a 2-month follow-up with monthly assessments in Study 3. Altogether, these studies provide one of the most comprehensive tests of how positive relationship experiences in nondistressing contexts are linked to romantic attachment.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 2
    Citation - Scopus: 2
    My Partner Really Gets Me: Affective Reactivity To Partner Stress Predicts Greater Relationship Quality in New Couples
    (Amer Psychological Assoc, 2024) Selcuk, Emre; Gunaydin, Gul; Ascigil, Esra; Bayraktaroglu, Deniz; Ong, Anthony D.
    Affective reactivity, defined as within-person increases in negative affect triggered by daily stressors, has well-established links to personal well-being. Prior work conceptualized affective reactivity as an intrapersonal phenomenon, reflecting reactions to one 's own stressors. Here, we conceptualized reactivity interpersonally, examining one 's responses to a romantic partner 's daily stressors. Across four longitudinal dyadic studies, we investigated how reactivity to partner stress predicts relationship quality appraisals. In fledgling couples, reactivity to a partner 's stressors, assessed via weekly (Study 1; N = 152) and daily (Study 2; N = 144) diaries, positively predicted partner relationship quality. In both studies, the associations were mediated by the partner 's perceptions of responsiveness. Furthermore, reactivity to partner stress buffered against declines in partner relationship quality over 8 weeks in Study 1 and 13 months in Study 2. The relevance of reactivity to partner stress for relationship quality diminished in the later stages of relationships. Among samples of established couples (Studies 3 and 4, Ns = 164 and 208, respectively), reactivity to partner stress did not directly predict partner relationship quality or moderate its trajectory over time. Overall, the predominant pattern across four studies painted a portrait of relational well-being benefits specific to fledgling relationships. Through its novel framework of situating affective reactivity interpersonally between partners, the present research contributes to both affective science and relationship science.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - Scopus: 16
    The Role of Positive Relationship Events in Romantic Attachment Avoidance
    (Amer Psychological Assoc, 2022) Gunaydin, Gul; Bayraktaroglu, Deniz; Selcuk, Emre; Besken, Miri; Karakitapoglu-Aygun, Zahide
    Motivated by the Attachment Security Enhancement Model (Arriaga et al., 2018), the present research investigated the associations between positive relationship experiences and romantic attachment avoidance in three dyadic studies that combined multiple methods, including daily diaries, laboratory observations, and longitudinal follow-ups. Frequency of daily positive relationship events (but not external positive events) during a 21-day diary period predicted declines in romantic attachment avoidance (but not anxiety) from pre- to post-diary in fledgling couples (Study 1) and newlyweds (Study 2). Video-recorded discussions of fledgling couples' shared positive experiences revealed that behaviors validating the relationship (but not simply showing conversational interest) predicted lagged declines in romantic attachment avoidance (but not anxiety) over 1 month (Study 3). The associations were mediated by positive affect during the diary period in Studies 1 and 2, and by changes in positive affect from pre- to post-discussion in Study 3. Positive relationship experiences did not significantly interact with time in predicting romantic avoidance over a 1-year follow-up with quarterly assessments of attachment orientations in Study 1, over an 8-month follow-up with monthly assessments in Study 2, or over a 2-month follow-up with monthly assessments in Study 3. Altogether, these studies provide one of the most comprehensive tests of how positive relationship experiences in nondistressing contexts are linked to romantic attachment.