Robust Medical Image Watermarking Using Frequency Domain and Least Significant Bits Algorithms
Loading...

Date
2018
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ieee
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Watermarking and stenography are getting importance recently because of copyright protection and authentication. In watermarking we embed stamp, logo, noise or image to multimedia elements such as image, video, audio, animation, software and text. There are several works have been done in watermarking for different purposes. In this research work we used watermarking techniques to embed patient information into the medical magnetic resonance (MR) images. There are two methods have been used; frequency domain (Digital Wavelet Transform-DWT, Digital Cosine Transform-DCT and Digital Fourier Transform-DFT) and spatial domain (Least Significant Bits-LSB). Experimental results show that embedding in frequency domains resist against one group of attacks, and embedding in spatial domain is resist against another group of attacks. Peak Signal Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Similarity Ratio (SR) values are two measurement values for testing. This two values gives very promising result for information hiding in medical MR images.
Description
Elbasi, Ersin/0000-0002-8603-1435
ORCID
Keywords
Watermarking, Medical Image, Frequency Domain, Least Significant Bits, Security
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Kaya, Volkan; Elbasi, Ersin, "Robust Medical Image Watermarking Using Frequency Domain and Least Significant Bits Algorithms", Proceedings 2018 International Conference on Computing Sciences and Engineering, (2018).
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
14
Source
International Conference on Computing Sciences and Engineering (ICCSE) -- MAR 11-13, 2018 -- Kuwait, KUWAIT
Volume
Issue
Start Page
1
End Page
5
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 8
Scopus : 24
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 17
Google Scholar™


