Response Bias in Numerosity Perception at Early Judgments and Systematic Underestimation
Loading...

Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Mental number representation relies on mapping numerosity based on nonsymbolic stimuli to symbolic magnitudes. It is known that mental number representation builds on a logarithmic scale, and thus numerosity decisions result in underestimation. In the current study, we investigated the temporal dynamics of numerosity perception in four experiments by employing the response-deadline SAT procedure. We presented random number of dots and required participants to make a numerosity judgment by comparing the perceived number of dots to 50. Using temporal dynamics in numerosity perception allowed us to observe a response bias at early decisions and a systematic underestimation at late decisions. In all three experiments, providing feedback diminished the magnitude of underestimation, whereas in Experiment 3 the absence of feedback resulted in greater underestimation errors. These results were in accordance with the findings that suggested feedback is necessary for the calibration of the mental number representation.
Description
Kilic, Asli/0000-0002-6052-9796
ORCID
Keywords
Numerosity Perception, Mental Number Line, Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off, Response Deadline Procedure, Judgment, Humans, Perception
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
Kılıç, Aslı; İnan, Aslı Bahar (2022). "Response bias in numerosity perception at early judgments and systematic underestimation", Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 84, No. 1, pp. 188-204.
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
2
Source
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Volume
84
Issue
1
Start Page
188
End Page
204
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 10
SCOPUS™ Citations
1
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Google Scholar™


