Bit Error Rate Analysis of Gaussian, Annular Gaussian, Cos Gaussian, and Cosh Gaussian Beams With the Help of Random Phase Screens
Loading...

Date
2014
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Optical Soc Amer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Using the random phase screen approach, we carry out a simulation analysis of the probability of error performance of Gaussian, annular Gaussian, cos Gaussian, and cosh Gaussian beams. In our scenario, these beams are intensity-modulated by the randomly generated binary symbols of an electrical message signal and then launched from the transmitter plane in equal powers. They propagate through a turbulent atmosphere modeled by a series of random phase screens. Upon arriving at the receiver plane, detection is performed in a circuitry consisting of a pin photodiode and a matched filter. The symbols detected are compared with the transmitted ones, errors are counted, and from there the probability of error is evaluated numerically. Within the range of source and propagation parameters tested, the lowest probability of error is obtained for the annular Gaussian beam. Our investigation reveals that there is hardly any difference between the aperture-averaged scintillations of the beams used, and the distinctive advantage of the annular Gaussian beam lies in the fact that the receiver aperture captures the maximum amount of power when this particular beam is launched from the transmitter plane. (C) 2014 Optical Society of America
Description
Keywords
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 01 natural sciences, 0104 chemical sciences
Citation
Eyyuboğlu, H.T. (2014). Bit error rate analysis of Gaussian, annular Gaussian, cos Gaussian, and cosh Gaussian beams with the help of random phase screens. Applied Optics, 53(17), 3758-3763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.53.003758
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q3

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Source
Applied Optics
Volume
53
Issue
17
Start Page
3758
End Page
3763
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 11
Scopus : 12
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 4
SCOPUS™ Citations
12
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
11
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 24, 2026
Google Scholar™


