Mothers in Cases of Incest in Turkey: Views and Experiences of Professionals
Loading...

Date
2013
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer/plenum Publishers
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper aims to understand how professionals view non-offending mothers in cases of incest. Its data is based on a larger qualitative research project with 98 professionals in Turkey, including both frontline workers and those who join the process after the disclosure of abuse and are contacted professionally in incest cases. In spite of the differences in their views, the interviewed professionals have acknowledged the critical role of the mother in various phases of incest from disclosure of abuse to the treatment of the victim. However, they have also pointed out the insufficiencies and ambivalences of the mothers in terms of dealing properly with incest by underlining their economic and social vulnerability. The results reflected that the mothers need to be perceived in another light, understood better and empowered according to their needs to become vital partners within the support system combating incestuous abuse.
Description
Keywords
Child Abuse, Mother Blame, Non-Offending Mothers, Combating Incestuous Abuse, Mothers' Empowerment, 360, Mother's Empowerment, Mothers' empowerment, Non-offending mothers, Combating incestuous abuse, Non-offending Mothers, Mother Blame, Combating Incestuous Abuse, Mother blame, Mothers’ Empowerment, Non-offending, Child Abuse, Child abuse
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, 0509 other social sciences
Citation
Kardam, Filiz; Bademci, Emine (2013). "Mothers in Cases of Incest in Turkey: Views and Experiences of Professionals", JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 253-263.
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
10
Source
Journal of Family Violence
Volume
28
Issue
3
Start Page
253
End Page
263
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 8
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 47
SCOPUS™ Citations
8
checked on Feb 26, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
7
checked on Feb 26, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Feb 26, 2026
Google Scholar™


