Re-Examining the Real Interest Rate Parity Hypothesis (Riph) Using Panel Unit Root Tests With Asymmetry and Cross-Section Dependence
Loading...

Date
2017
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper investigates the validity of the real interest rate parity hypothesis (RIPH) using a panel unit root approach. For this purpose, first we estimate the possible nonlinear data-generating processes of the real interest rate differential series and using these estimates determine which panel unit root test is better for analyzing the RIPH. To this end, smooth transition autoregressive and threshold autoregressive (TAR) models are estimated for two different panels of countries: G7 and post-Soviet transition economies. The results show that the data displays both strong asymmetry and high transition speed. Therefore, secondly, we propose a new panel unit root test where the alternative is stationary with asymmetric TAR adjustment, and provide their empirical power properties. Finally, we demonstrate that our newly proposed test is able to provide conclusive evidence in favor of the RIPH in contrast to the other panel unit root tests considered.
Description
Corakci, Aysegul/0000-0002-0684-4103; Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan/0000-0001-7358-3567
Keywords
Real Interest Rate Parity, Asymmetric Adjustment, Nonlinear Panel Unit Root, Cross-Section Dependence
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
Corakçı, Ayşegül; Emirmahmutoglu, Furkan; Omay, Tolga, "Re-examining the real interest rate parity hypothesis (RIPH) using panel unit root tests with asymmetry and cross-section dependence", Emprica, Vol.44, No.11, pp.91-120, (2017).
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
19
Source
Empirica
Volume
44
Issue
1
Start Page
91
End Page
120
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 17
Scopus : 21
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 12
SCOPUS™ Citations
21
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
22
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Page Views
3
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Google Scholar™


