Turkish Muslim Healers: a Qualitative Investigation of Hocas and Their Methods
Loading...

Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
A vast majority of Turkish individuals are Muslim, and several Turkish individuals refer to traditional healers to get help for medical and psychological problems. The purpose of the present study was to investigate Turkish traditional healing methods and to delineate the kinds of presenting problems that the clients bring to healers, methods used by the healers, the healing process, and the effect of healing on the clients. For this purpose, 11 participants were interviewed. The data were analyzed using the consensual qualitative research method. Nine domains emerged from the interviews: symptoms, diagnosis, etiology, treatment, response to treatment, characteristics of healers, clients' beliefs and desire to be healed, all healing coming from Allah (God), and characteristics of jinns. The findings were discussed in light of Kleinman's (Patients and healers in the context of culture: an exploration of the borderland between anthropology, medicine, and psychiatry, University of California Press, Berkeley,1980) illness explanatory model and characteristics of Turkish culture.
Description
Ar-Karci, Yagmur/0000-0003-4197-3848
ORCID
Keywords
Traditional Healers, Muslim Healers, Turkish Culture, Turkish culture, Turkey, Humans, Muslim healers, Traditional healers, Islam
Fields of Science
03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine
Citation
Çınarbaş, D. C., Tuna, E., & Ar-Karci, Y. (2020). "Turkish Muslim healers: A qualitative investigation of hocas and their methods", Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 2397-2413.
WoS Q
Q3
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
9
Source
Journal of Religion and Health
Volume
59
Issue
5
Start Page
2397
End Page
2413
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 6
PubMed : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 32
SCOPUS™ Citations
6
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
7
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Page Views
5
checked on Feb 23, 2026
Google Scholar™


