A Comparative Study of Silicon Nitride and Sialon Ceramics Against E. Coli
Loading...

Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In recent decades, due to some limitations from alumina (Al2O3) and zirconia (ZrO2), silicon nitride (Si3N4) has been investigated as a novel bioceramic material, mainly in situations where a bone replacement is required. Si3N4 ceramics and its derivative form, SiAlON, possess advantages in orthopedics due to their mechanical properties and biologically acceptable chemistry, which accelerates bone repair. However, biological applications require additional properties, enabling stronger chemical bonding to the surrounding tissue for better fixation and the prevention of bacteria biofilm formation. Therefore, two commercial Si3N4 and SiAlON ceramics were investigated in this study and compared to each other according to their material properties (like wetting angles and surface chemistry) and their antibacterial behaviors using E. coli. Results provided evidence of a 15% reduction in E. coli colonization after just 24 h on Si3N4 compared to SiAlON which is impressive considering no antibiotics were used. Further, a mechanism of action is provided. In this manner, this study provides evidence that Si3N4 should be further studied for a wide range of antibacterial orthopedic, or other suitable biomaterial applications.
Description
Keywords
Silicon Nitride, Si3N4, Sialon, Bioceramics, Antibacterial
Fields of Science
0103 physical sciences, 02 engineering and technology, 0210 nano-technology, 01 natural sciences
Citation
Akın, Şeniz R. Kuşhan; Garcia, Caterina Bartomeu; Webster, Thomas J. (2021). "A comparative study of silicon nitride and SiAlON ceramics against E. coli", Ceramics International, Vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 1837-1843.
WoS Q
Q1
Scopus Q
Q1

OpenCitations Citation Count
16
Source
Ceramics International
Volume
47
Issue
2
Start Page
1837
End Page
1843
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 16
Scopus : 18
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 16
Web of Science™ Citations
17
checked on Feb 25, 2026
Page Views
2
checked on Feb 25, 2026
Google Scholar™


