Queue-Responsive Adaptive Signal Control vs. Webster Optimization: A Multi-Criteria Simulation Assessment at a Signalized Intersection

Abstract

Traffic signal control at signalized intersections plays a key role in mitigating urban congestion, reducing vehicle emissions, and improving road safety. This study examines three signal control strategies at a four-approach isolated intersection simulated using the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) microscopic traffic simulator: a baseline fixed-time plan, a Webster-optimized fixed-time plan, and a queue-responsive adaptive controller implemented through the Traffic Control Interface (TraCI). The strategies were evaluated under balanced traffic demand of 600 vehicles per hour per approach over a 3600 s simulation period. Performance was assessed using eight indicators related to mobility, environmental impact, and safety, including average delay, travel time, queue length, network speed, throughput, CO2 emissions, fuel consumption, and time-to-collision events. The results indicate that the adaptive controller produced the greatest improvements, reducing delay by 14.3%, travel time by 13.6%, CO2 emissions by 9.3%, fuel consumption by 9.4%, and TTC conflicts by 11.2%, while increasing network speed by 47.9%. The Webster-optimized plan achieved moderate improvements, lowering delay by 4.8% and fuel consumption by 5.0% without additional infrastructure requirements. Overall, the findings suggest that both signal re-timing and queue-responsive adaptive control can enhance intersection performance, with the preferred approach depending on available infrastructure and implementation costs.