Bilgilendirme: Kurulum ve veri kapsamındaki çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Göstereceğiniz anlayış için teşekkür ederiz.
 

Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on Certain Issues Regarding Nationality

dc.contributor.author Tuncagil, Gulce Gumuslu
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-23T08:07:31Z
dc.date.accessioned 2025-09-18T12:09:06Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-23T08:07:31Z
dc.date.available 2025-09-18T12:09:06Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Sovereign states shall decide who will acquire or maintain their nationality. Thus, the issue on acquisition and loss of nationality of a State falls within the exclusive competence of this State. In other words, the issue of nationality, in principle, is a reserved domain of states. States shall determine their conditions about acquiring and losing their nationality in their internal laws. However, fulfilment of the stipulated conditions in internal law does not mean that person has an absolute right for acquisition of nationality because states have discretionary power. This discretionary power should be used by States in accordance with international law. The terms of international law consists of international conventions, customary international law and the principles of law generally recognized. The main international document that adopted the right to a nationality as a human right is the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Besides this, some of the conventions relating to nationality issues are from 12 April, The Hague Convention on Certain Questions relating to the Conflict of Nationality Laws (1930) and the European Convention on Nationality (6 November, 1997). In our paper, firstly, the articles on the right to nationality and loss and deprivation of nationality in these international legal documents will be examined briefly. After that, in our study, the approaches of the European Court of Human Rights to the decisions about loss of nationality against a person's will and the denial of naturalization requests are going to be examined. Notwithstanding the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not contain any provision on the right to a nationality.in the past, the European Commission of Human Rights rejected cases concerning loss or deprivation of citizenship or denial of naturalization request on the grounds of incompatible ratione materiae. The ECrtHR changed its judicial opinion about this issue. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Gümüşlü Tunçağıl, Gülce (2021). "Vatandaşlığa İlişkin Bazı Meseleler Hakkında Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararları", Public and Private International Law Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 99-127. en_US
dc.identifier.doi 10.26650/ppil.2021.41.1.815537
dc.identifier.issn 2651-5377
dc.identifier.issn 2667-4114
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2021.41.1.815537
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12416/11311
dc.language.iso tr en_US
dc.publisher Istanbul Univ en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Public and Private International Law Bulletin
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Decisions Of The European Court Of Human Rights en_US
dc.subject Right To A Nationality en_US
dc.subject Reserved Domain Of States en_US
dc.subject Certain Issues Regarding Nationality en_US
dc.subject The European Convention On Human Rights Article 8 en_US
dc.title Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on Certain Issues Regarding Nationality en_US
dc.title Vatandaşlığa İlişkin Bazı Meseleler Hakkında Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi Kararları tr_TR
dc.type Article en_US
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Tuncagil, Gulce Gumuslu
gdc.author.yokid 45484
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.access open access
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department Çankaya University en_US
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tuncagil, Gulce Gumuslu] Cankaya Univ, Hukuk Fak, Milletlerarasi Ozel Hukuk Anabilim Dali, Ankara, Turkey en_US
gdc.description.endpage 127 en_US
gdc.description.issue 1 en_US
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı en_US
gdc.description.startpage 99 en_US
gdc.description.volume 41 en_US
gdc.description.woscitationindex Emerging Sources Citation Index
gdc.description.wosquality Q4
gdc.identifier.openalex W3127426781
gdc.identifier.trdizinid 476118
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:000799126200004
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.index.type TR-Dizin
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.downloads 16
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.8007945E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Hukuk
gdc.oaire.keywords INCOTERMS® 2020
gdc.oaire.keywords Teslim
gdc.oaire.keywords INCOTERMS® 2020;Lex Mercatoria;Teslim;Masraflar;Hasarın Geçişi
gdc.oaire.keywords Lex Mercatoria
gdc.oaire.keywords Transfer of Risks
gdc.oaire.keywords INCOTERMS® 2020;Lex Mercatoria;Delivery;Costs;Transfer of risks
gdc.oaire.keywords Masraflar
gdc.oaire.keywords Law in Context
gdc.oaire.keywords Delivery
gdc.oaire.keywords Hasarın Geçişi
gdc.oaire.keywords Costs
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.383838E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.views 16
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.02
gdc.opencitations.count 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 1
gdc.wos.citedcount 0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 0b9123e4-4136-493b-9ffd-be856af2cdb1

Files