Solving Multi-Dimensional Fractional Optimal Control Problems With Inequality Constraint by Bernstein Polynomials Operational Matrices
Loading...

Date
2013
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this paper, we present a method for solving multi-dimensional fractional optimal control problems. Firstly, we derive the Bernstein polynomials operational matrix for the fractional derivative in the Caputo sense, which has not been done before. The main characteristic behind the approach using this technique is that it reduces the problems to those of solving a system of algebraic equations, thus greatly simplifying the problem. The results obtained are in good agreement with the existing ones in the open literature and it is shown that the solutions converge as the number of approximating terms increases, and the solutions approach to classical solutions as the order of the fractional derivatives approach 1.
Description
Rostamy, Davood/0000-0001-9585-8904
ORCID
Keywords
Bernstein Polynomials, Caputo Derivative, Fractional Optimal Control Problems, Operational Matrix, Orthogonal polynomials and functions of hypergeometric type (Jacobi, Laguerre, Hermite, Askey scheme, etc.), Control/observation systems governed by functional-differential equations, Fractional derivatives and integrals, operational matrix, fractional optimal control problems, Bernstein polynomials, Caputo derivative
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
Alipour, Mohsen; Rostamy, Davood; Baleanu, Dumitru, "Solving multi-dimensional fractional optimal control problems with inequality constraint by Bernstein polynomials operational matrices" Journal Of Vibration And Control, Vol.19, No.16, pp.2523-2540, (2013).
WoS Q
Q2
Scopus Q
Q2

OpenCitations Citation Count
76
Source
Journal of Vibration and Control
Volume
19
Issue
16
Start Page
2523
End Page
2540
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 72
Scopus : 92
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 20
Google Scholar™


