Evaluating Machine Learning Techniques for Fluid Mechanics: Comparative Analysis of Accuracy and Computational Efficiency
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This study focuses on applying machine learning (ML) techniques to fluid mechanics problems. Various ML techniques were used to create a series of case studies, where their accuracy and computational costs were compared, and behavior patterns in different problem types were analyzed. The goal is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of ML techniques in fluid mechanics and to contribute to the field by comparing them with traditional methods. Case studies were also conducted using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), and the results were compared with those from ML techniques in terms of accuracy and computational cost. For Case 1, after optimizing relevant parameters, the Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models all achieved an R² value above 0.9. However, in Case 2, only the ANN method surpassed this threshold, likely due to the limited data available. In Case 3, all models except for Linear Regression (LR) demonstrated predictive abilities above the 0.9 threshold after parameter optimization. The LR method was found to have low applicability to fluid mechanics problems, while SVM and ANN methods proved to be particularly effective tools after grid search optimization.
Description
Keywords
Fluid mechanics;Solar dryer;Artifical neural networks;Converging-diverging nozzle;Stirrer, Mechanical Engineering (Other), Makine Mühendisliği (Diğer)
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
N/A
Scopus Q
N/A

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
International journal of energy studies (Online)
Volume
9
Issue
4
Start Page
679
End Page
721
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


